Question:
Please compare the specs of these 2 car speakers and tell me which is best and why?
Medis
2012-10-15 22:27:41 UTC
http://www.crutchfield.com/S-16X1xqRMPnz/p_113KFC1693/Kenwood-KFC-1693PS.html

http://www.crutchfield.com/S-Mgnr3Bg6WWa/p_107DB651/Polk-Audio-db651.html

I already have the Kenwoods, new and unopened in box. Are the Polks better than the Kenwoods? And if so, why, and is it worth the trouble to get them and sell the others? Only thing that makes me iffy on the Polks is the fact that they are 2-way. Also, the "peak wattage" on the Polks is 180 instead of 240 on the Kenwoods - if that means anything.
Four answers:
?
2012-10-16 09:28:24 UTC
It is sad to admit, but you remind me of me. I want to know now only what is better, but why, and what you base your opinion on. Thirst for knowledge is good. Occasionally too much analysis leads to paralysis, it’s an expression. Sometimes people drown in the sea of information and are unable to make a decision. I believe that even a bad decision is better than no decision.



Now, back to your question, Comparing Kenwood (KW) to Polk.



Design: KW is 3-way vs Polk 2 way.

All things being equal, how can a more complicated 3-way design sell for less than less complicated 2-way design? If parts are of the same quality level, it is impossible. Thus, KW uses cheap, probably leftover parts, to assemble their speaker. And this shows as you will see.





KW uses urethane foam surround vs Polk’s Butyl Rubber

Butyl rubber is many times more durable than urethane foam. Foam is material filled with air bubbles, it’s not a solid material. Butyl rubber is thin, flexible solid material that costs more and lasts longer.





KW claims that their midrange cone is water resistant vs Polk is Marine use certified.

Not just one little part that is water resistant, Polk’s speakers can stay under the sun for years, in the rain, in the snow, and ice. Not only material have to be of much better quality, the design of all parts has to be superior to withstand the extreme temperatures, UV light from the sun, and the elements.





KW rates its speaker 2-70 rms watts vs Polk 100 rms watts



KW rates the sensitivity of it speaker at 88db vs Polk’s 92 db (this is one point away from being perceived as 50% louder. An increase of 10 db points is perceived by the human ear as being twice as loud.)





KW has ½” ceramic flat tweeter vs Polk’s 3/4" Liquid-Cooled Silk-Polymer Composite Dome.

Hard surface of the tweeter adds sharp shrill to the highs and can cause headache. Nobody is using flat tweeters.

The cone of a tweeter is usually in the shape of a dome.

Silk is the best cover for tweeter dome.





KW has states its lowest frequency response at 80hz vs. Polk’s 35hz





I feel I should be the spokesperson fro Polk Audio. I like most of their products. If you test speakers in stores, keep in mind that you are testing car speakers in open air. They will sound very different once they are inside the car. Bring your own store-purchased CD with your familiar music and have them play your cd through the same head unit, and switching between different speakers. You will see that Polk will sound closer to what the composer wanted you to hear.



If you don’t send me a bottle of nice champagne, at least show some pictures from your installation and your notes, although champagne would be nice too.
Brian P
2012-10-16 02:49:30 UTC
Polk Audio speakers are the diamond in the rough when it comes to cheap good speakers. There are dozens of world class competitors that use polk audio as there speakers, and they win SQ (Sound Quality) competitions. I would def go with the polks, and those kenwoods arent truly a 3-way system. A true 3 way would to have your low end, prolly a 5-8in sub, along with your mids, a 5.5 or 6.5in speaker, and your highs, a 1in tweeter. Thats a 3 way, those kenwoods simply have one as a coax (tweeter mounted in speaker) and then a speaker. While thats not really bad, it also isnt good, I would ditch the kenwoods, and go for the polks.
?
2012-10-16 07:35:41 UTC
MOST of the time -- you get what you pay for in terms of speaker quality and performance.



I certainly wouldn't favor the kenwood just b/c it's a 3 way. Many of the highest quality speakers available are 2 way. The way I see it is if a 6.5 woofer needs more than one tweeter to keep up the tweeters must be pretty poor quality.

Peak power doesn't mean anything at all.

Besides - the 88 (KW) vs 92 (Polk) sensitivity ratings indicate the Polk may actually be a little louder at 60w (its optimal rms power rating) than the KW is at 70w



Being common brands, and widely available at retail stores I'd probably try to listen to both of them to see if I believe one outperforms the other in sound, because honestly, sound quality is purely subjective, and what sounds good to me may not sound good to you at all.
?
2012-10-16 00:20:17 UTC
Well if you don't have an amplifier your not going to get that wattage to your speakers anyways.



But over-all the POLK it has bilt-in crossovers that'll help out and regulated your tweeters/speakers freq. so they don't blow.



However, try looking for alpine speakers, or pioneer, or jl, or kicker, or rockford, all of those are better than polk and ken


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...